« The Architecture of Economic Expediency | Main | George Bush Jokes About “Your Performance At The Gridiron” While Thousands Die »

March 16, 2006

Potrero Hill, Volkswagen, and Modernist Housing in San Francisco

[Updated March 16, 2006:  A few bloggers picked up on my earlier posting (Boston, Curbed, PotreroHillSF), so I've expanded it.]

The automaker Volkswagen recently (early 2006) featured a photograph of San Francisco's De Haro Street (in the Potrero Hill neighborhood) on their  website home page  (click the photo to see full size) (by the way, f**k Volkswagen):

Volkswagen web page, San Francisco, De Haro Street

I've been in one of those new homes, and yes, it is really nice! Amazing views, an open and airy living room, and a couple of nice outdoor terraces  all make for  a fantastic living environment. The home has three bedrooms total, two of which are average (a little  small and dark), while the master bedroom is a 1/2 story higher than the main living floor and is very comfortably sized.

Recent History of 692 De Haro Street

Before this got built, the site was occupied by an old Victorian farmhouse known as the “Little Red House” that must have dated to the 1880s or 1890s, surrounded by a gigantic yard the likes of which we simply don't normally have around here. Native Potrero Hill bedrock outcroppings poked up through the topsoil in the steeply sloped back yard, where the hill rises to Rhode Island Street.  The home was relatively small and decrepit, one of the old “shacks” of Potrero HIll that have been flattened over the past 10 years to make way for new maximum-density housing.

Below: the Little Red House in early 2001; I photographed those trees on the sidewalk as they were cut down in preparation for the pending demolition.

Little Red House in early 2001

Below: the Little Red House in early 2001, after clearing away the front trees.

De Haro Street: Little Red House in early 2001

The house was finally demolished in 2001 after a minor neighborhood fight to save it. When the demolition was underway, the neighbors on the left side of the property hung a giant sign on their balcony which read “MURDER!” with an arrow pointing to the demolished home.

Below: demolition of Potrero Hill's Little Red House, April 4, 2001, San Francisco:

demolition of Potrero Hill's Little Red House, April 4, 2001, San Francisco

2001-692-Deharo-Littleredhouse-Demolition-4

The lot during grading, June 2001:

2001-06-Deharo-Emptylot-2

Construction soon commenced, as in this view from March 2002:

2002-Deharo-Construction-1

And by the fall of 2002, the building was done. The developer got a zoning variance to divide the parcel into 3  lots, onto which they built the condos at 692, 694, 696 De Haro;  the unit on the left end at 698 De Haro Street was part of the same development. Each of the distinct façades is a two-unit building, each a 3-bedroom. Note that the red unit began life as yellow:

2002-09-13-Deharo-2

...until the ratty looking apartment building at 680 De Haro was painted yellow too, seen here in March 2003:

2003-03-25-Deharo-Yellows-2

The developer probably wasn't too happy about that, so he painted his freshly painted building again, this time in red, seen here in April 2005:

De Haro Street, San Francisco: 2005

And a bonus! A dusk photo of this site, October 2005 »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

March 16, 2006 in City // San Francisco, Potrero Hill // San Francisco | Permalink

Comments

I love it.

Thanks for the update. I understand why people would like to keep old stuff around, but the new homes are a definite improvement - plus, you get six families where one used to live.

Posted by: John K | Mar 16, 2006 8:35:19 PM

I do miss the garden and the wildcrafting that was done on that site. However, there is still a great little path through the block there - just uphill of the new condos on DeHaro, look for a little footpath which winds up to Rhode Island St.

Posted by: Lynne | Mar 29, 2006 9:58:14 PM

"[O]ne of the old “shacks” of Potrero HIll that have been flattened over the past 10 years to make way for new maximum-density housing."

Two story condos buildings are maximum density housing?

(I'm all for tearing down shacks and building new housing, just wish it were actually high density.)

Posted by: Mike Linksvayer | Apr 5, 2006 10:04:40 PM

Mike - I think it may maximum density as allowed by the neighborhood's zoning. I'm pretty sure the builder went to the maximum height allowed; and they probably built for the maximum financial return — fancy 3-bedroom condos with high-end finishes, as opposed to cheap 1 and 2 bedroom apartments.

True, smaller apartments or condos (like Potrero Court at 23rd Street and the 101, with many 1 and 2 bedroom units) would probably have resulted in even higher density of people-per-acre; the high-earners who live in the De Haro development are not exactly raising 3-children families in their 3-bedroom condos.

They're not 2 stories; they're actually about 4 stories in a weird staggered-floor configuration. Each unit has an upstairs and downstairs, and the top units also have an upper floor above the main floor (master bedroom), so overall it's actually like 4 and a half stories.

Posted by: Matt Jalbert | Apr 7, 2006 12:06:20 PM

you may have already seen this if you read their blog, but i thought you'd get a kick out of it, too (or find equal disgust, etc) - Potrero Hill poseurs

Posted by: willo | Apr 7, 2006 2:52:15 PM

Like all major cities that lack a Landmark Preservation Committee, all old and historic sites are demolished by wrecking crews. They call it progress even though generations to come are being robbed of their heritage, history,and culture. It's sad but inevitable. I know. I live in Las Vegas, NV. and historic outposts have become fodder for new casino towers.

Posted by: Stevie Gee | May 7, 2006 2:19:32 PM

I looked at renting the lower unit in the early 90's. What a dump. I think we miss the romantic notion of having a lovely little home with an ample yard on Potrero Hill. It was one of the few remaining places on the hill that let us imagine what it might have been like 50-75 years ago when there was more space and fewer people. Unfortunately, economics dictated the resulting multi-unit replacement. The lil' red house itself - not so special, but the "idea" of the lil' red house...well, it's nice to dream.

Posted by: ph goat | May 18, 2006 4:09:49 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.